State Superintendent of Education: SEO Ed Digest Vol2 Issue 6
DC Home Mayor DC Guide Residents Business Visitors DC Government Kids

State Superintendent of Education

SEO HOME
OSSE HOME
OSSE HOME
OSSE HOME
Education Research
PROGRAMS
About OSSE
STATE BOARD OF
  EDUCATION

Agency Responsiblities
Post-Secondary Education 
   Advice

Education Opportunity
   Center

INFORMATION
Director's Biography
PROGRAMS
Director's Letter
Financial Aid
Grants and Loans
Financial Aid
Mission & Vision
INFORMATION
School Enrollment Audit
IPEDS
OPERA Services
ONLINE SERVICE
   REQUESTS

ONLINE SERVICE
  REQUESTS

Organizational Chart
Outreach Centers
Scholarship Search
PROGRAMS
SERVICES
INFORMATION
INFORMATION
ONLINE SERVICE
   REQUESTS

ONLINE SERVICE
   REQUESTS

About OSSE
How to Reach Us
Ask the Director
FOIA Requests
News Room
OSSE Ed Digest
OSSE Employment
  Opportunities

FAQs
Helpful Links
Site Map
Performance
Early Care & Education Administration
Education Licensure Commission
Educator Licensing & Accreditation
GEAR UP
Higher Ed Financial
  Services

Nutrition Services
Policy, Research &
  Analysis

Public Charter School
   Financing & Support

Adult & Family Education
Agency Calendar
DC Licensed Colleges
EdStat
Education Center
Educational Excellence
Employment
  Opportunities

Financial Aid
GED Testing Center
Home Schooling
Legislation
Public School Funding
Reports & Publications
Schools
School Test Score Data
Special Education
State Education Agency
   Functions

State Governance
  Documents

State Long.Ed. Data
Student Support Teams
Teaching & Learning
   Standards

Transitory Services
Online Application
DCAdoption
DCLEAP
DCTAG
Federal Aid and
   Tax Credits

Financial Aid Checklist
Financial Aid Seminars
Other Aid Resources
About State Board
  of Education

SEO Ed Digest 
 
Vol. 2, Issue 6
June 2005 
 
Bringing urban K-12 education resources to policymakers, parents, advocates, and district and school staff in the District of Columbia 
 
Research on DC Schools
National Lessons Learned
New Ideas
 
The State Education Office does not endorse the views expressed in the resources and reports contained in the SEO Ed Digest.
Related Links
  • DCDOCS
    Subscribe to the digest.
  • Education Center
    Find local information and resources.
  • React!
    Share your thoughts about the digest.
  • Research 101
    Learn how to judge the quality of research.
  • SEO_Ed_Digest@dc.gov
    Contact us.
     
     
    Reports
     
    May 2005
    February 2005
    2004
    December 2004
     

     Arrow Indicating Top of Page

    May 2005
    Declaration of Education: Keeping Our Promise to the District's Children
    www.k12.dc.us/dcps/SPindex.htm
    On May 2, 2005, Superintendent Clifford Janey released a strategic plan for the District of Columbia Public Schools. The plan describes the vision, goals and strategic priorities that will guide the school system's work over the coming years.  The DC Education Compact - a coalition of leaders from education, government, business, community organizations, foundations and higher education - released a companion plan for school-community partnerships to strengthen DCPS.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    May 2005
    Charter Schools: Oversight Practices in the District of Columbia
    http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05490.pdf*
    The 2005 DC Appropriations Act required the Government Accountability Office to examine the performance of DC charter school authorizers in their approval and oversight roles.  This interim report addresses two questions: 1) What are the responsibilities specified for the DC charter school authorizers in the School Reform Act? and 2) How are the DC authorizers carrying out these responsibilities?  The full results will be published in the fall of 2005.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    May 2005
    Technology Counts 2005: Education Transfer: Moving Technology Dollars in New Directions
    http://www.edweek.org/ew/toc/2005/05/05/index.html
    Education Week's 8th Annual Report on school technology includes in-depth articles on issues surrounding technology spending, state profiles, and the first-ever ranking of state technology leaders.  The report also discusses state use of data-management systems to help them meet the reporting requirements and student-achievement goals of the federal No Child Left Behind Act.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    May 2005
    The National Randomized Field Trial of Success for All: Second-Year Outcomes
    www.successforall.net/_images/pdfs/SFA_RE_Year%202_Outcomes.doc
    This report examines the second year outcomes of Success for All, a comprehensive reading reform model that has been implemented in over 1,200 schools nationwide.  The study was funded primarily through a grant from the US Department of Education in order to address limitations found in previous research through the use of a randomized research design.  The study found statistically significant school effects on three out of the four tested literacy outcomes and that Success for All may put students up to a half a year ahead of their peers in regular classrooms.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    May 2005
    Who’s Teaching Our Youngest Students?  Teacher Education and Training, Experience, Compensation and Benefits, Assistant Teachers
    nieer.org/resources/files/NPSteachers.pdf*
    This is the first of several reports to be released by the National Prekindergarten Study, a large-sample, broad-based study designed to evaluate the implementation and classroom practices of state-funded Prekindergarten programs across all the states that fund them.  This report examines the characteristics of teachers and assistant teachers teaching children in 40 different states.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    May 2005
    How to Expand and Improve Preschool in California:  Ideals, Evidence and Policy Options
    pace.berkeley.edu/pace_universal_preschool.pdf*
    The National Center for Infant and Early Childhood Health Policy has released a series of 15 reports and corresponding policy briefs all geared to helping states develop their own initiatives for optimizing health, development, and well-being in early childhood.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    May 2005
    Prekindergartners Left Behind: Expulsion Rates in State Prekindergarten Systems
    www.ffcd.org/PDFs/NationalPreKExpulsionPaper03.02_new.pdf *
    The Yale University Child Study Center used data from 52 state-based prekindergarten programs during the 2003-04 school year and interviews of 3,900 preK teachers to analyze expulsion prekindergarten expulsion rates.  Those rates were then compared against expulsion rates for K-12 students listed in the US Department of Education’s “Elementary and Secondary School Survey: 2000."  The study finds that, overall, prekindergarten children are being expelled from their classes for behavior problems at a higher rate than students in K-12 schools and provides recommendations strategies for implementing program supports necessary to lower these rates.users.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    May 2005
    The Accidental Principal: What Doesn't Get Taught in Ed Schools
    www.educationnext.org/20053/pdf/34.pdf*
    In order to analyze what is being taught in a stratified national sample of 31 principal-preparation programs, the authors of this Education Next study reviewed more than 200 course syllabi that covered almost 2,500 total course weeks.  The authors conclude that there is a lack of emphasis on results-oriented management or accountability, which they believe is critical for districts depending on principals to lead improvement in the era of No Child Left Behind.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    May 2005
    Preparing and Training Professionals: Comparing Education to Six Other Fields
    www.financeprojectinfo.org/publications/preparingprofessionals.pdf*
    This report, by The Finance Project, compares the approaches used to educate and train teachers with the professional education and training of six other fields, which include accounting, nursing, law, architecture, firefighting, and law enforcement.  The analysis examines the following ten elements of professional development for each field: 1) approval of preparation programs; 2) clinical training; 3) national entry exam; 4) practice prior to licensure; 5) standards for in-service training; 6)induction programs; 7) peer support and learning; 8) managers; 9) financing; and 10) financial incentives.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
     
    May 2005
    Making Progress Toward Graduation: Evidence from the Talent Development High School Model
    www.mdrc.org/publications/408/full.pdf*
    The Talent Development High School model is a comprehensive school reform initiative that was developed to address the challenges faced by low-performing urban high schools. This report discusses the key findings of an independent evaluation of the Talent Development model in five Philadelphia high schools.  The evaluation concludes that: 1) Talent Development produced substantial gains in attendance, academic course credits earned, and promotion rates during students’ first year of high school; 2) Talent Development’s strong positive impacts during the first year of high school are consistent with the model’s intensive initial focus on the ninth grade; and 3) The improvements in credits earned and promotion rates for ninth-graders were sustained as students moved through high school.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    February 2005
    College Readiness Begins in Middle School
    www.act.org/path/policy/pdf/CollegeReadiness.pdf*
    This report, released by the ACT, suggests that many students don't start thinking about their post-high school plans early enough, and that those who do may not be taking the right classes to prepare to meet their goals.  The ACT report recommends that school districts set up a formal program to help students develop a college readiness plan starting in middle school. It urges schools to work with all students and their parents, explaining to them the importance of taking a challenging curriculum and the effect it can have on their future educational, career and income options. It also recommends that schools work with families to calculate college costs and develop a plan to meet those costs.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
    2004
    Evaluation of Programs Supported by The After School Corporation
    www.policystudies.com/studies/youth/Evaluation%20TASC%20Programs.html
    In 2004, Policy Studies Associates completed a five-year evaluation of a large-scale after-school program supported by The After-School Corporation (TASC) in New York City. TASC supports community-based and other nonprofit organizations in the delivery of after-school services to students, in collaboration with public schools. The summary report reviews program effectiveness in meeting quality expectations and in generating benefits for participating students. It also identifies program practices associated with student benefits.  Supplementary papers review 1) the TASC program approach, 2) student participation in TASC programs, 3) TASC activities and students' reactions to them, and 4) changes in the educational performance of TASC participants. 
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    2004
    Guide for Creating and Improving School/Business Partnerships
    www.corpschoolpartners.org/pdf/coke_how_to_guide.pdf*
    The Council for Corporate and School Partnerships developed this guide using research and interviews with individuals who have experience creating, implementing and evaluating successful partnerships.  The guide is intended as a framework of effective strategies within which to build a partnership.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    December 2004
    Investing in Our Future: Education and the Economy in Prince George's County
    www.pgbea.org/SummitReport.pdf*
    A 2004 report from the Prince George's County Business-Education Alliance says that the county is positioned to be an economic dynamo in the next 25 years, but its promise can be fulfilled only if it significantly improves its public education system. The report is based on presentations and discussions at the Prince George's Business-Education Summit, which brought together business and education leaders, academic experts, public officials, community activists, and other invited guests for a daylong meeting. The report examines the potential for economic growth in Prince George's and the challenges facing the public schools and the community college. It also outlines trends in public education funding and explores and explains the sources of money used to finance the public school and community college budgets. In addition, it provides recommendations for policy makers and business leaders.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page
     
    December 2004
    Re-Examining a Primary Premise of Market Theory: An Analysis of NAEP Data on Achievement in Public and Private Schools
    www.pgbea.org/SummitReport.pdf*
    This study examines the 4th and 8th grade NAEP performance of students at public and private schools to analyze the impact of school models on students' academic achievement.  The study reports that, overall, private school students outscored their public school counterparts.  However, the authors found that the performance of the private school students fell significantly below that of public school students when the analysis controlled for socio-economic status, race, and disability status.
     
     Arrow Indicating Top of Page

     Previous Page  Back to OSSE Ed Digest Main

    -
    * This document is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF) and a PDF reader is required for viewing.
    Download a PDF reader or learn more about PDFs.